Judicial Interference!

I have a little problem with the California judge who oveturned the vote defining marriage as between a man and a woman. I'm not upset about the process, but I am upset about is him being of a sexual orientation. When judges have conflicts of interest, they should excuse themselves from the decision. Here's the problem...

Every human on the planet has a prefered form of sexual orientation, so they have a conflict, and are not capable of an unbias decision. Even someone who's decided to remain celibate, has a preference, so how do we come to a fair decision?

Perhaps we should look back to the roots of marriage. Marriage is a religious sacrament, that has been hijacked by the government. Yhey've licensed it and collected a fee so you may participate in something your faith originally offered as a religious ceremony. Since it was originally offered as a rite of religion, wouldn't it be wise to see what then entity that has no sexual preference has to say on the matter?

God's word, the Bible, defines marriage for us. It's a union between one man and one woman. The Lord has no sexual bias in this decision. His purpose of defining marriage in this manner is so we could reproduce and preserve our race.

Does this trample anyone's rights? Not at all, we are all equally able to marry someone of the opposite sex. There is no discrimination. No matter what your sexual preference, your able to wed.

Now should you wish a unholy union outside of those parameters, that's your decision. It's up to your maker to decide your judgement, not us. You're free in this country to make that decision, you're not free to define it as a marriage. Simply rename it. The term "civil union" comes to mind. Attempting to change the definition of a rite is similar to calling a car a bicycle. While they're both modes of transportaion, one is hardly the other.

God Bless!
Capt. Bill